🔗 Share this article Families' Distress Over Coastal Erosion Threatening Norfolk Burial Sites Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones. A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations. A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward. “Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.” Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated. Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground. “You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.” “I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.” A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated. “It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.” She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.” Seeking Answers and Certainty An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious. Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near. “It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.” A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.” It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.” “There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.” The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.