🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume atomic negotiations with Washington provided that it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue worked, and shared new appeals had come from intermediaries to restart negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran had not yet reached a point to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Route

The foreign minister is treading a challenging path since Iran aims to avoid appear to be operating from a situation of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more resilient defensively and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Previous Negotiations Unexpectedly Ended

The earlier sessions of discussions between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when Israel, with US support, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that culminated with the US president declaring the locations had been obliterated. Following this, EU nations exercised their privilege to reimpose international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the discussions that American atomic experts could work inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Officials stated three times they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the deal to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Position

Iranian officials stated the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the offer could be reintroduced in certain ways if talks reopen.

The US president recently stated he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but in private Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from America either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of inactivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran asserts negotiations is not part of a show.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his address to the gathering, intended to depict the US as a controlling nation that abuses the concept of global regulations, the foreign minister stated the two-week conflict demonstrated the clash could not be resolved by armed force. He said the attacks began with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and concluded with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were mounted with total Washington understanding and coordination, making faith difficult to rebuild.

Dialogue Continues the Final Answer

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted diplomacy; it was the United States and the Western nations that had repeatedly tried to dictate their desires during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be active and remains the final solution to resolve conflicts, but its requirements, regulations and fundamentals must be respected."

"If they speak to the nation of Iran with the language of respect and respect, they will get a answer in the equivalent tone."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of repair and recovery, the foreign minister said he was certain Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We gained many lessons from this engagement; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He stated: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to obliterate, stays intact. The installations and machinery, if eliminated, will be restored; what is important is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but failed to shatter. The Iranian people have become more powerful, more integrated, and more supportive of the administration and the country in the aftermath of this invasion."